Skip to main content

The Art of Pursuasion: A Helping Hand from Sales

I recently stumbled over this really great article from Steve Martin (not the comedian) in the Harvard Business Review on "Personality Traits of Top Sales People."  The article had some surprising revelations, most of which I realized could end up helping almost all of us in our daily lives one way or another.  It's a quick read, so do please run off and read it.  But I had a couple of thoughts about how Steve could help the rest of us out.
From Jeff Moore, http://topsuccesssite.com

Professional sales people are role models to all of us in at least one crucial thing:  the ability to pursuade.  Sales people get their targets to do two very hard things:  make a decision, and commit money to be spent on that decision.  In our lives, we may feel we have had a "big win" if a decision maker we work with tentatively agrees to go along with a suggestion we have made for a while on a trial basis (while planning to disclaim all knowledge if it goes south), so long as it doesn't cost anything.  Now picture that deal if it had been handled by a real professional:  the decision maker would have committed to the idea in the budget!  Perhaps a supportive email would have been sent!  Hands could have been shaken.  That's what I'm talking about!  How do we get there?

Surprisingly, to me (sorry, professional sales friends), it's not by being ostentatious or even friendly.  Top traits are:
  1. Modesty
  2. Conscientiousness
  3. Achievement Orientation
  4. Curiosity
  5. Lack of Gregariousness
  6. Lack of Discouragement
  7. Lack of Self-Consciousness.
Actually, when I compared this list of traits to the personalities of people I know are top sales people in my company, I realized they are very true, but I hadn't recognized them before.  So thank you HBR!  Additionally, though, I had a couple of thoughts about this, in terms of persuasion you or I might need to do on a daily basis:

Develop a pursuasive persona:  it's not what you might think!

If you are a person who likes to get her way, (and who isn't?), then here is a behavior strategy to cultivate in a work setting:  internally, be a man or woman of steel:  determine your goals in a way you can measure (brush up on S.M.A.R.T. goals), and then pursue those goals doggedly, sloughing off discouragement and self-consciousness.  This advice encompasses traits 2, 3, 6, and 7, above.  But externally, be modest, quiet, and somewhat aloof, coming out of your shell only to ask a lot of questions (1, 4, and 5, if you're keeping track).  This combination of behaviors tracks remarkably well to rules of thumb given to consultants when dealing with clients anyway (see for example Rule 22 in "Rules to being Software Consultants," "Only speak 30% of the time.").  Or think of the Art of War, always a handy reference for software consultants:

It is the business of a general to be quiet and thus ensure secrecy; upright and just, and thus maintain order. (XI.35)

In particular, understand that self-deprecating humor may not be the thing here for you or for your client.

I don't mean to be sexist, but I think especially of my women friends with this point.  Any of us who try to be friendly and non-scary as our primary communications mode may want to rethink this strategy in a work environment where we hope to be persuasive.  If we are trying to achieve anything in particular, we need the respect of our clients (or coworkers), not their friendship.  Martin says that you need to keep your emotional distance to stay in control:  "Dominance is the ability to gain the willing obedience of customers such that the salesperson's recommendations and advice are followed. The results indicate that overly friendly salespeople are too close to their customers and have difficulty establishing dominance."

Lastly, be a Tigger:  don't be self-conscious, and learn to bounce.

As Woody Allen famously said, "80% of success is just showing up."  Stay focused on the goal, and don't let small setbacks get in your way.

...because selling is what Tiggers do best!  

Comments

  1. Awesome post, it was so informative! I was doing research online on High Jump Software when I came across your blog. I'm happy I did because this was so interesting and helpful. Thank you for sharing this with us!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Do You Vote Someone Off of Your Agile Team?

One of the conundrums of agile conversion is that although you are ordered by management to "self-organize," you don't get to pick your own team.  You may not have pictured it this way, but your agile team members are going to be the same people you worked with before, when you were all doing waterfall!   I know I wasn't picturing it that way for my first agile team, so I thought I should warn you.  (I thought I was going to get between six and eight original Agile Manifesto signers.  That didn't happen.). Why "warn" you (as opposed to "reassure" you, say)?  Because the agile process is going to reveal every wart, mole, quirk, goiter, and flatulence issue on the team within a few hours.  In the old days, you could all be eccentric or even unpleasant in your own cube, communicating only by document, wiki, email, and, in extreme situations, by phone.  Now you are suddenly forced to interact in real time, perhaps in person, with written messag

A Corporate Agile 10-point Checklist

I'm pretty sure my few remaining friends in the "small, collocated team agile" community are going to desert me after this, but I actually have a checklist of 10 things to think about if you're a product owner at a big company thinking of trying out some agile today.  Some of these might even apply to you if you're in a smaller place.  So at the risk of inciting an anti-checklist riot (I'm sorry, Pez!), I am putting this out there in case it is helpful to someone else. From http://www.yogawithjohn.com/tag/yoga-class/ Here's what you should think about: 1.        Your staffing pattern.  A full agile project requires that you have the full team engaged for the whole duration of the project at the right ratios.  So as you provision the project, check to see whether you can arrange this staffing pattern.  If not, you will encounter risks because of missing people.  Concretely it means that: a.        You need your user experience people (if a

Your Agile Transformation Needs to Start with a Quiet Phase

From a really great blog post on agile adoption:  http://smoovejazz.wordpress.com/2011/02/16/an-agile-approach-for-adopting-agile-practices/ I've observed some different agile transformation patterns, and maybe you have too: Just Do Standups   (Shoot, then Aim):   some people feel that since you're "agile," you should just start doing stuff, like daily standups, and then build more of the the plan as you go.  Find a team and start doing some agile with them!  Start a revolution one practice at a time, one team at a time. Pros:   you're very busy from the start. Cons:   what exactly are you doing and why? KPI-Driven Change (Aim, then Shoot) : some people who have worked in large corporations for a while will tell you that to get the respect of the people, you need to start with a plan, support the plan with awesome printed and online collateral.  Then you "kick off," tell teams what to do, and measure them using "Key Productivity Indica