Skip to main content

How to Build Your Brand While Still Getting Things Done

Many of us consciously or unconsciously align ourselves in one way or another to the belief that if we work diligently, we will succeed in business. As Andrew Carnegie put it classically in 1903:
Do not make riches, but usefulness, your first aim; and let your chief pride be that your daily occupation is in the line of progress and development; that your work, in whatever capacity it may be, is useful work, honestly conducted, and as such ennobling to your life. (How to Succeed in Life, by Andrew Carnegie)
Those alignments come in different flavors:

"The Naive"
Some of us walk through life wearing a philosophical button (or, more scary, a physical one) that says:
Silly fools!  If we write really high quality code, and there is no-one in senior management there to properly interpret our code review, what have we accomplished?  (Apparently there is a comedy skit by the Royal Canadian Air Farce where they ask the question "If a tree falls in the forest, and no-one is there to hear it, where are they?" but I can't find a YouTube clip of it, so you will just have to imagine it for yourself.)

In fact, most of us notice eventually that "getting things done" does not directly translate into moving up the corporate ladder.  We are so busy pulling all-nighters to "fix the build" or "write the manual" or "solve the architectural problem" that we don't end up rubbing shoulders with the influential people who can vouch for us at promotion time.

 "The Cynical"
This comes in two forms:  people who get credit, and people who don't get credit and cry about it.  Some of us decide that since the straightest path to success is to get credit for things, we will make sure to get credit a lot.  So we will focus our energy on building our brand, and we will devote all waking hours, words, emails and deeds ensuring that as many things as possible are credited to us by the people who matter.  This can be a combination of exaggerations, fabrications, and appropriations of others' work, but overt distortions of fact should be limited, so that we don't get caught (very often).  Appearance is reality at bonus time!  So we shift gears.  Our new mantra is:
Meanwhile, others of us are not getting credit, and we are proud of it, except at annual review time.  How many nights have we spent sobbing into our beer with colleagues over how unfair life is, and how did that jerk get promoted, and "oh, she only manages up," and so on?  And then we move onto "I wouldn't want to be like that anyway," and we get distracted by something, and then another interesting problem comes up to solve, so we forget about it again until next year.  And it's a good thing, too, because our accomplishments are the collateral everyone is fighting to take credit for!   The story might end here, and it does with a lot of us in one cynical group or the other.

"The Phenomenon"
Some of us move past naive and also past cynical (to what you might call "Post-Cynical"), and ask the question not just sarcastically, but also in earnest:  is it possible to be successful without selling out?  If our passion is to do stuff, can we keep doing stuff, or do we have to spend all our time hanging out with important people connecting the dots that lead us to a lucrative career in consulting or an office with a window? Or at least a door?  Here we stop to ponder some people who seem to have it all, like Martin Fowler, Jim Highsmith, or Mary Poppendieck.  Those are people who do stuff and are also known for doing stuff.  They are real, and they are also famous.  Executives love them and so do disenfranchised smart people.  What does it take to be a genius who is also famous?
I don't actually know the answer to this.  If they tell you, let me know!  Meanwhile, let's power on.

"The Personal Brand Manager"
This is my strategy for the rest of us.  In real corporate trenches, we need to be aware of the choices we make with our time every day.  There are two parts to this.
1.  Don't be grandiose.  If you want to be famous, but you aren't, then figure out what you can do to make the most of what you do well.  I'm a big fan of this Steven R. Covey concept, the "Circle of Concern" and the "Circle of Influence."  Make sure you make a distinction in your mind each day between things you can do, and things you can't do.  Work on the ones under your control.  Do not focus on the things that are not under your control.  Work to build your influence.  Otherwise you will be angry all the time.

2.  Be wise in controlling the message as well as the results around your efforts.  Understand that for those of us who are not Fowler, Highsmith, or Poppendieck (and who knows, maybe for them too!), every action includes a measurable accomplishment of some kind and a story about it.  If you are mindful, you can decide and influence what happens and who gets credit, and the obvious answer isn't always for you to do both.
We should think about what story we want to see around the things we are making happen.  Those of us who are just average people galumphing along, should go ahead and make things happen, if that is our passion, but we should be putting effort into all three areas:
  • We should ensure that we do not get credit all the time.  Certainly, to some degree we do this so that people will know we know how to play the game, but we also do it because it builds good will on a solid foundation.  If we are consultants, we want our client to get credit for the stuff we are coaching them to do, and we are willing to accept their anxiety and anger around changes they are making.  We build our career by building their careers.  If we are corporate employees, we want to build up our staff and our colleagues by being quick to credit others and slow to credit ourselves.  And of course we want to credit our boss!
  • We should ensure that we do get credit some of the time.  Don't be the tree falling in the forest.  Nobody promotes a dead tree.  Make sure you know who needs to know what you are doing, and make sure they know about it.  You can even be a little Machiavellian about this:  know that when you send out a memo to your whole department praising your team, you are praising yourself.  But that's not a bad thing--it's one of those nice cases where it is a win for everyone.  If nobody knows what you're doing, you have no-one to blame but yourself.
  • We should ensure that we "manage up" sometimes, even when we don't have a specific accomplishment to brag about.  We need to be out in the world doing something besides just what our job calls for.  If we want to grow and have more influence, we need to understand that this type of networking will take time, and we need to take the time to do it.  We should not wait for the go-live or the big sale to set up meetings, to request a mentor, or to join a networking group for our fellow women, racial group, sexual orientation group, special technical interest group, or neighborhood volunteering group.  ("Former players of ASCII dungeons and dragons games, unite!")
Is that the same as "taking credit for things we didn't do"?  It doesn't have to be.  But if it is, it should be because we are relentless corporate go-getters who are willing to move ahead at any cost!  How's that for a rousing take-away?!

The point is that we have the responsibility to be our own advocate, and we need to understand what we want, and we need to work proactively to do things and to have whatever the right level of influence is, in order to keep doing things at the scale appropriate for us.  So go get it, guys!  Meanwhile me, I'm going to spend the rest of the day trying to track down that stupid online Canadian comedy sketch.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Do You Vote Someone Off of Your Agile Team?

One of the conundrums of agile conversion is that although you are ordered by management to "self-organize," you don't get to pick your own team.  You may not have pictured it this way, but your agile team members are going to be the same people you worked with before, when you were all doing waterfall!   I know I wasn't picturing it that way for my first agile team, so I thought I should warn you.  (I thought I was going to get between six and eight original Agile Manifesto signers.  That didn't happen.). Why "warn" you (as opposed to "reassure" you, say)?  Because the agile process is going to reveal every wart, mole, quirk, goiter, and flatulence issue on the team within a few hours.  In the old days, you could all be eccentric or even unpleasant in your own cube, communicating only by document, wiki, email, and, in extreme situations, by phone.  Now you are suddenly forced to interact in real time, perhaps in person, with written messag

A Corporate Agile 10-point Checklist

I'm pretty sure my few remaining friends in the "small, collocated team agile" community are going to desert me after this, but I actually have a checklist of 10 things to think about if you're a product owner at a big company thinking of trying out some agile today.  Some of these might even apply to you if you're in a smaller place.  So at the risk of inciting an anti-checklist riot (I'm sorry, Pez!), I am putting this out there in case it is helpful to someone else. From http://www.yogawithjohn.com/tag/yoga-class/ Here's what you should think about: 1.        Your staffing pattern.  A full agile project requires that you have the full team engaged for the whole duration of the project at the right ratios.  So as you provision the project, check to see whether you can arrange this staffing pattern.  If not, you will encounter risks because of missing people.  Concretely it means that: a.        You need your user experience people (if a

Your Agile Transformation Needs to Start with a Quiet Phase

From a really great blog post on agile adoption:  http://smoovejazz.wordpress.com/2011/02/16/an-agile-approach-for-adopting-agile-practices/ I've observed some different agile transformation patterns, and maybe you have too: Just Do Standups   (Shoot, then Aim):   some people feel that since you're "agile," you should just start doing stuff, like daily standups, and then build more of the the plan as you go.  Find a team and start doing some agile with them!  Start a revolution one practice at a time, one team at a time. Pros:   you're very busy from the start. Cons:   what exactly are you doing and why? KPI-Driven Change (Aim, then Shoot) : some people who have worked in large corporations for a while will tell you that to get the respect of the people, you need to start with a plan, support the plan with awesome printed and online collateral.  Then you "kick off," tell teams what to do, and measure them using "Key Productivity Indica