tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628439266792763028.post1787539824038875227..comments2024-03-12T23:42:36.948-05:00Comments on Pragmatic Agilist: Using Agile to Optimize Value of ProjectsElena Yatzeckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06015548238979618153noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628439266792763028.post-40632122949993204642013-03-04T16:42:39.698-06:002013-03-04T16:42:39.698-06:00Hi Elena,
Thanks for the link to Jeff's blog,...Hi Elena,<br /><br />Thanks for the link to Jeff's blog, that nicely pulls together a few ideas I'd seen elsewhere from Jeff and others.<br /><br />I agree the 'walking skeleton' with incremental embellishment is a good model in many cases (though there remain some tough cases when dealing with embedded systems, security reviews, etc...)<br /> <br />Cheers, David.David Allsopphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07128810051397190691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628439266792763028.post-1421310822963339062013-03-04T16:22:01.006-06:002013-03-04T16:22:01.006-06:00Hey David, for pipelines, I would use a tool like ...Hey David, for pipelines, I would use a tool like Jeff Patton's Story Maps, where the "base level" assumption would be that the pipeline as a whole (or perhaps some separable chunks, if they are meaningful) would need to be delivered almost from the first iteration, but the amount of embellishment and depth of feature around each stage of the pipeline could be valued comparatively.<Elena Yatzeckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06015548238979618153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628439266792763028.post-71259908560135738292013-03-04T14:53:30.244-06:002013-03-04T14:53:30.244-06:00Hi,
I think this approach assumes that features a...Hi,<br /><br />I think this approach assumes that features are parallel, largely independent things that each have value in their own right? This assumption does not hold for systems that are a sequential pipeline of operations - the entire system has value, but each component in isolation has zero value. As a metric to characterize this, we could use the ratio of the 'minimum marketable David Allsopphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07128810051397190691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628439266792763028.post-48021594680830625982010-11-30T11:24:17.170-06:002010-11-30T11:24:17.170-06:00Thanks for the link, Peter--sorry I didn't get...Thanks for the link, Peter--sorry I didn't get back to you sooner! -EElena Yatzeckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06015548238979618153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628439266792763028.post-14313792503345582372010-09-18T03:50:07.728-05:002010-09-18T03:50:07.728-05:00Hi Elena
I found this very interesting and in li...Hi Elena <br /><br />I found this very interesting and in line with a lot of my own idea.<br /><br />I wrote some stuff on Value Driven Development which you may find useful: http://jupitermoonbeam.blogspot.com/2009/07/value-driven-development.htmlPeter Gillard-Mosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10275408277486693139noreply@blogger.com